Hello, this is Project Orion II's Chief Designer and recently I received hate mail from a YouTube user named Chris Hanson who is sympathetic to other users who hate me all because I am strict in my pursuit of spreading factual information and will not tolerate any of their asinine delusions. I have a three-part video series dispelling the negative myths created about me but Chris Hansen created yet another negative myth about me claiming that I am a "YouTube dictator" all because I rightfully flagged Super Godzilla 12's videos about me for trolling, bullying, and throwing the same old asinine garbage at me that I and others have already refuted. This guy threatened that some other users will flag any more videos that I make about them which in that case would be false flagging and is just to get back at me. Those fools are just having temper tantrums all because I will not let them have their delusions or dogmas. In this post I will take on the pernicious stereotypes about me.
Myth #1: Orion II Carl Sagan is a Lion King fan boy who does not understand that not everybody likes what he likes.
FACT: I do understand that some people dislike what I like, and this includes The Lion King. I have no problem with other people not liking The Lion King and know that not all those who dislike The Lion King do so for stupid reasons. The most valid reason that I know of for not liking The Lion King is the negative depiction of hyenas throughout the course of the film. Some may do it for matters of taste alone which is fine. But the one thing that I have zero tolerance for is for an irrational idea to be perpetuated. I do respect the opinions of others unless the opinion is biased, unfair, irrational, dogmatic, or invalid. So the real reason that I do not let people believe things such as the claim that Simba is a spoiled brat and that Timon and Pumbaa are evil is because such claims are delusional and incorrect.
Myth #2: Orion II Carl Sagan is 100% pro-censorship and against free speech.
FACT: I am open to dissent and different opinions. I flag Super Godzilla 12 because he uses threats, he is a troll, tries to provoke a fight with me, pushes my buttons on purpose, tries to boss me around, bullies me while encouraging others to join in, and constantly throws Confused Matthew's thoroughly refuted anti-Lion King claims at me. All of that is harassment and cyber-bullying and not free speech. I will let Confused Matthew's Lion King review stay up so other people can see how much of a nincompoop he is. I am just very protective and I do not want those three Lion King protagonists to get hurt by sickos like SG12 who view them as evil without giving them a chance. I flag videos that try to force me to accept an irrational idea such as SG12's videos about me trying to manipulate me into accepting an idiocy when I will have none of it. I remove comments and block users who bring up worn-out refuted arguments because I cannot waste my time with such clowns, but I will welcome mature dissent and new arguments to address.
Myth #3: Orion II Carl Sagan is a big time hypocrite.
FACT: I know what the word hypocrisy means and me not letting others get away with delusional garbage is not hypocrisy. Me flagging SG12's troll and bullying and apologetic videos about me is not hypocrisy because he is almost never coming up with anything new or worthy, almost always throwing the same old worn-out fallacious claims at me demanding that I agree with it. It is not hypocrisy to say that childhood and autism are no excuses for blatant stupidity, just look at the prototypical Christopher Bores fan boy as an example. I would be a hypocrite if I were dogmatic about Godzilla especially since I know little about that franchise, so am able to admit when I am wrong, and the same is true for me with Star Wars. SG12 is the real hypocrite since he bullied me and encouraged others to join in despite accusing Simba of doing the same thing ot Zazu in the song "I Just Can't Wait To Be King". Despite his claims to cherish the freedom of speech, he wants to tell the writers of The Lion King that they cannot have Timon and Pumbaa be protagonists all because he hates them. And that is the tip of the iceberg of SG12's hypocrisy.
Myth #4: Orion II Carl Sagan is a YouTube dictator.
FACT: I am NOT being a dictator and I am certainly not saying that everybody agree with me or saying that you have to like what I like. I am only trying to promote factual information and there are some people who feel threatened by the facts that I present. Enigma Hood also blocks and removes comment insisting on there being stealth in space because those buffoons are insisting on the same old refuted garbage and he will not waste his time and those fools attack him for it. I feel the same way about those who keep insisting that Simba is a spoiled brat and that Timon and Pumbaa are evil despite me having already addressing every argument that they can muster, this gets very irritating very fast. I am not trying to dictate, I am just trying to stop irrational ideas from being perpetuated.
The real motivation behind these despicable myths about me is solely to get back at me for not letting them get away with such below average intelligence ideas such as the belief that Timon and Pumbaa are evil, especially since Super Godzilla 12 is the mastermind of these hurtful untruths against me. Don't believe those myths, they are just fear mongering tactics and online temper tantrums lashing out at me for not giving them their way.
Sirius Sagan
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Saturday, November 17, 2012
Titan AE Fanboy 101
Hello, this is Project Orion II's Chief Designer and I will talk about who I view as the prototypical Titan AE fanboy and a poster boy for pro-Titan AE immaturity, he is a YouTube user known as NotOrdinaryInGames. I informed this guy that I don't like Titan AE and he blocked me each time all because he detested what I had ot say. I tried to reason with him from some of the accounts that I now closed, and he did not address my points or even try to rebuttal me, he just did skimpy relies that almost always attacked me and then blocked me. Plus he has comments pending approval and deletes my anti-Titan AE comments that I try to post on his channel no matter how mature. This guy is a coward who is 100% PRO-CENSORSHIP and against the Freedom of Speech. The last time I talked to him sending him one of my first anti-Titan AE videos, he called me a weirdo and did the only thing to me which was not an ad hominem attack, but was another type of logical fallacy. He refused to watch my video or he watched it and did not address a single point that I made against one of his favorite movies. Worse yet as I learned in the comments of a Danny's Commentary: Confused Matthew video about what's so wrong with Confused Matthew's idiotic Lion King review, he gave a clue that he agrees with the dumpy Lion King review in question. He said that he did not want ot give his opinion as to not start a flame war, which makes me madder at him more than I already am. I fear that he likes Titan AE for an immoral reason because the movie seeks to wipe out The Lion King via planet busting. I am okay with people liking Titan AE for good messages such as hope and second chances, but have ZERO TOLERANCE for liking it because it destroys what one hates with extreme force. However, there is some question to whether or not Titan AE was written as a revenge attempt against The Lion King for overtaking Don Bluth, there is loose evidence to suggest this possibility. However, I am not sure because the evidence has to be rock solid before my suspicions are confirmed or refuted. I hold dear the Carl Sagan idea that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and I hope that my suspicions are wrong.
NotOrdinaryInGames, you need to face reality and check out Atomic Rockets which is excellent and where I first learned about handwavium. Handwavium is anything that flat out violates the laws of physics such as faster than light drive, stealth in space, tangible pure energy (i.e. Drej), and magical planet-creating spacecraft (i.e. Titan Project). I have no problem with other people liking Titan AE and I do not get upset with all Titan AE fans, this can be proven by my subscribing to a mature Titan AE fan on YouTube known as DrejStinger1986. NotOrdinaryInGames; you are perfectly entitled to like Titan AE, but you got to admit when you are wrong and to address what others have to say at times. This guy blocks me and removes my comments because he is scared. He is scared because I have points that he cannot refute so he resorts to censorship and outright attacks against me.
NotOrdinaryInGames' Two Logical Fallacies
1) Personal Attack Fallacy (Ad Hominem): An informal logical fallacy in which the arguer verbally attacks their opponent without addressing the substance of the opposing argument in a desperate effort ti discredit anything they say. This is fallacious because verbally attacking the person does not constitute refuting an argument.
NotOrdinaryInGames' type of Ad Hominem of choice is the Ad Hominem Abusive in which he calls me names such as "weirdo" all because I tell him that I have legitimate reasons to dislike Titan AE. He knew that I was not a troll since I have shown him that I am serious, but he called me a weirdo saying that "there is no place for 'weirdos' on his channel" and to "enjoy my block". And guess what, he blocked me! He uses the word "weirdo" to refer to those who say that they dislike what he likes, for instance Titan AE.
2) Authority Fallacy (Ad Verecundiam): An informal logical fallacy in which one sets up their own ands/or someone else's authority to exempt their conclusion form criticism and scrutiny. This is fallacious because stated authority do not necessarily prove the conclusion correct. Authority arguments are totally worthless!
The one and only thing that I can recall that NotOrdinaryInGames said to me that was not an Ad Hominem was an Authority Fallacy in which he used the Internet Movie Database to shield Titan AE against my scrutiny of the film. This Ad Verecundiam was in the reply he sent me to a Titan AE review that I sent him and the same message in which he called me a "weirdo".
NotOrdinaryInGames, criticism is something that you need to learn to deal with, when someone such as myself gives you legitimate criticism you block them and outright attack them. NotOrdinaryInGames, here are the valid reasons why I loathe Titan AE:
1) A spaceship destroys Earth for asinine reasons storywise.
2a) The story is soaked in an orgy of handwavium
2b) A handwavium device is humanity's only hope in the film.
And despite that, NotOrdinaryInGames takes me for an IDIOT all because I give valid reasons for not liking a movie that he loves, what a fanboy we have here! I also acknowledge the valid reasons others may have for liking Titan AE such as hope, second chances, finding a home, etc. I bug off from mature Titan AE fans because they acknowledge me and I acknowledge them. Conversely, NotOrdinaryInGames refuses to acknowledge me even though I would acknowledge him if he said what he likes about Titan AE, he is one pathetic fan bigot.
NotOrdinaryInGames' Channel Avatar |
NotOrdinaryInGames' Two Logical Fallacies
1) Personal Attack Fallacy (Ad Hominem): An informal logical fallacy in which the arguer verbally attacks their opponent without addressing the substance of the opposing argument in a desperate effort ti discredit anything they say. This is fallacious because verbally attacking the person does not constitute refuting an argument.
NotOrdinaryInGames' type of Ad Hominem of choice is the Ad Hominem Abusive in which he calls me names such as "weirdo" all because I tell him that I have legitimate reasons to dislike Titan AE. He knew that I was not a troll since I have shown him that I am serious, but he called me a weirdo saying that "there is no place for 'weirdos' on his channel" and to "enjoy my block". And guess what, he blocked me! He uses the word "weirdo" to refer to those who say that they dislike what he likes, for instance Titan AE.
2) Authority Fallacy (Ad Verecundiam): An informal logical fallacy in which one sets up their own ands/or someone else's authority to exempt their conclusion form criticism and scrutiny. This is fallacious because stated authority do not necessarily prove the conclusion correct. Authority arguments are totally worthless!
The one and only thing that I can recall that NotOrdinaryInGames said to me that was not an Ad Hominem was an Authority Fallacy in which he used the Internet Movie Database to shield Titan AE against my scrutiny of the film. This Ad Verecundiam was in the reply he sent me to a Titan AE review that I sent him and the same message in which he called me a "weirdo".
NotOrdinaryInGames, criticism is something that you need to learn to deal with, when someone such as myself gives you legitimate criticism you block them and outright attack them. NotOrdinaryInGames, here are the valid reasons why I loathe Titan AE:
1) A spaceship destroys Earth for asinine reasons storywise.
2a) The story is soaked in an orgy of handwavium
2b) A handwavium device is humanity's only hope in the film.
And despite that, NotOrdinaryInGames takes me for an IDIOT all because I give valid reasons for not liking a movie that he loves, what a fanboy we have here! I also acknowledge the valid reasons others may have for liking Titan AE such as hope, second chances, finding a home, etc. I bug off from mature Titan AE fans because they acknowledge me and I acknowledge them. Conversely, NotOrdinaryInGames refuses to acknowledge me even though I would acknowledge him if he said what he likes about Titan AE, he is one pathetic fan bigot.
Friday, November 16, 2012
Wreck-It-Ralph analogue to anti-Avatar Star Wars fanboys
Hello, this is Project Orion II's Chief Designer and recently I saw the new Disney film called Wreck-It-Ralph three times in theaters before writing this post. Some of you may be wondering what this has to do with the handful of jealous Bad Apple Star Wars Fans who rail against what is currently my all-time favorite movie, James Cameron's Avatar, let me explain. For many years before Avatar was first released in theaters, the Star Wars franchise was #1 in the box office and #1 in the space genre. Avid Star Wars fans got used to Star Wars being first place in space genre and at times even vowed to fight to keep it so. Then on Friday, December 18, 2009, came a very realistic interstellar science fiction blast called Avatar and it was so successful that it overtook Star Wars in both the box office and the space genre, so Bad Apple Star Wars Fans such as YouTube user Radith87 grew jealous. They are so jealous that they even want the Death Star to pulverize Pandora just to punish Avatar for overtaking Star Wars, and Radith87's two anti-Avatar videos are perfect examples. Let me quote fro the description box of the first "How Avatar Should Have Ended" Star Wars apologist video: "Avatar may be popular, but it shall be punished." Such Star Wars supremacists are acting just like the villain in Wreck-It-Ralph, Turbo (a.k.a. King Candy) from TurboTime. That is because TurboTime was at first the most popular video game in the arcade until a newer race car game called Roadblasters came. Turbo got so jealous that he left TurboTime to sabotage Roadblasters to the point that both games were unplugged and taken out of the arcade. However, Turbo escaped and eventually took over Sugar Rush where he disguised himself as a King Candy. And that is why I liken anti-Avatar Star Wars extremists to Turbo. Plus these Star Wars-obsessed bad apples are acting just like the CCCP did in latter 1969 when they lost the moon race to Apollo 11 because the CCCP was one of the few countries that did not broadcast the Apollo 11 mission live because they were upset that they were beaten. Prior to Apollo 11, the Soviets did have their space first such as the first human in space in Vostok 1 on April 12, 1961. Likewise before Avatar, Star Wars did have its time of being #1 in the space genre. Those Star Wars supremacists should learn to be grateful and count their blessings instead of lashing out like they are doing.
For the record, not all Star Wars fans are lashing out against Avatar, just some of them are. Recently George Lucas sold Lucasfilm to Disney and Disney is going to make three more Star Wars movies such as an Episode VII. If any one of those Disney Star Wars films overtakes Avatar, I will not get upset and will be grateful that Avatar will have had its time as #1 in space genre and the box office. I wish to also set a positive example for the envious Star Wars extremists who bash Avatar all because it beat out Star Wars in the box office and space genre alike. I do get the inflated ticket pricing thing too.
Turbo from Disney's Wreck-It-Ralph |
Sunday, November 11, 2012
Bantokfomoki Sucks
Hello, this is Project Orion II's Chief Designer and I know for a fact that non-FTL interstellar travel is real despite what the doubters say, and I vehemently disagree with that pessimistic YouTube user known as Bantokfomoki. Bantokfomoki believes in the made-up "New World Order (NWO)" and that pornographers are really trying to literally kill people, I am not joking and this is proven by most of his videos and his channel description. But the reason I am talking about him is his fanatical denial of realistic interstellar travel. He is against what he calls a "scientific status quo" and says that he goes by internal instead of external as those who believe this supposed "scientific status quo" do. I did not watch his Avatar videos, but I did watch is pessimistic video against fusion powered interstellar travel which is very narrow-minded. He claims that the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and Tsiolkovshy's equation prevent both fusion and antimatter powered starflight as well as travelling close to the speed of light, SHAMEFUL! He believes that no matter what, your ship will be destroyed by heat, but the scientists who disagree with this grouch know about the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and Tsiolkovsky's equation, and are good problem solvers. Starships will likely have heat radiators to dissipate excess waste heat in order to prevent the spacecraft from being destroyed by its own propulsion heat. Even that does not phase this nay sayer who thinks that he knows it all. He takes all of those professional scientists and all others who have legitimate reasons for believing in interstellar travel and takes them all for IDIOTS! NEWSFLASH Bantokfomoki, there is NOTHING in physics that prevents you from travelling close to the speed of light, it has already been observed in experiments on Special Relativity. Bantokfomoki, don't you DARE try to deny that you are bigoted against advocates of realistic interstellar travel because I have found evidence in your videos and comments to prove it despite a claim that you wish it were possible. Now I will quote his most blatant denial of realistic interstellar travel on record. This is responding to the idea of light sails and is a comment on his Avatar Addendum video:
"Yes. And that's much worse. 'Light' is the most efficient form of propulsion as far as fuel requirements go: To fling protons out to push off of ... kills the idea of interstellar travel even more completely. Instead of just 'ludicrous' ... it becomes clinically 'insane'. ;o)" - Bantokfomoki
As you can see from this comment that I quoted above, he literally thinks that advocating realistic interstellar travel is a mental illness, what a narrow-minded aerospace bigot we have here. He is trying to foist his pessimism onto everybody else and what I quoted is crystal clear evidence of it. Bantokfomoki will only contribute pure negativity and nothing that is constructive or positive. The guy has superiority complex and this ";o)" at the end of the quoted comment proves just how much of a snob he truly is. I blocked the guy for his snobbery, belief in the NWO, his asinine idea that nudity kills, and his nay saying against realistic starflight. I simply just cannot stand to guy or to watch his videos. In fact, this guy is even WORSE than SuperGodzilla12 because even SuperGodzilla12 does not say that liking what he dislikes is a mental illness, Bantokfomoki does say that disagreeing with him on space travel is a sickness. In another words, even SuperGodzilla12 is much nicer and more open minded than Bantokfomoki. Heck, even Confused Matthew is more open and tolerant than this nasty nay sayer!
My beef with Bantokfomoki is that he thinks that he knows it all and everything that he does is filled with hype, especially his anti-starflight videos. Do not talk to Bantokfomoki if you can at all avoid it. Trust me, I learned this lesson the hard way under a now closed YouTube account when I talked to him on the one video of his that I saw. This is advice from someone who has made mistakes. I recommend that all supporters of realistic interstellar travel follow the seven steps in the image below to deal with nay sayers like Bantokfomoki:
Don't get me wrong here, I still maintain that FTL drive and stealth in space are both violations of physics. Bantokfomoki proceeds on a false premise that realistic starflight too violates physics which it certainly does not, but FTL wishful thinkers and stealth in space fans proceed on an opposite false premise claiming that people broke laws of physics before. There was nothing in physics preventing objects from moving faster than sound, since the tips of whips and bullets did it centuries and even before the advent of manned flight. Particles in particle accelerators have been travelling close to the speed of light for decades. And yes, the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics forbids any stealth in space while Relativity forbids FTL travel.
"Yes. And that's much worse. 'Light' is the most efficient form of propulsion as far as fuel requirements go: To fling protons out to push off of ... kills the idea of interstellar travel even more completely. Instead of just 'ludicrous' ... it becomes clinically 'insane'. ;o)" - Bantokfomoki
As you can see from this comment that I quoted above, he literally thinks that advocating realistic interstellar travel is a mental illness, what a narrow-minded aerospace bigot we have here. He is trying to foist his pessimism onto everybody else and what I quoted is crystal clear evidence of it. Bantokfomoki will only contribute pure negativity and nothing that is constructive or positive. The guy has superiority complex and this ";o)" at the end of the quoted comment proves just how much of a snob he truly is. I blocked the guy for his snobbery, belief in the NWO, his asinine idea that nudity kills, and his nay saying against realistic starflight. I simply just cannot stand to guy or to watch his videos. In fact, this guy is even WORSE than SuperGodzilla12 because even SuperGodzilla12 does not say that liking what he dislikes is a mental illness, Bantokfomoki does say that disagreeing with him on space travel is a sickness. In another words, even SuperGodzilla12 is much nicer and more open minded than Bantokfomoki. Heck, even Confused Matthew is more open and tolerant than this nasty nay sayer!
My beef with Bantokfomoki is that he thinks that he knows it all and everything that he does is filled with hype, especially his anti-starflight videos. Do not talk to Bantokfomoki if you can at all avoid it. Trust me, I learned this lesson the hard way under a now closed YouTube account when I talked to him on the one video of his that I saw. This is advice from someone who has made mistakes. I recommend that all supporters of realistic interstellar travel follow the seven steps in the image below to deal with nay sayers like Bantokfomoki:
Don't get me wrong here, I still maintain that FTL drive and stealth in space are both violations of physics. Bantokfomoki proceeds on a false premise that realistic starflight too violates physics which it certainly does not, but FTL wishful thinkers and stealth in space fans proceed on an opposite false premise claiming that people broke laws of physics before. There was nothing in physics preventing objects from moving faster than sound, since the tips of whips and bullets did it centuries and even before the advent of manned flight. Particles in particle accelerators have been travelling close to the speed of light for decades. And yes, the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics forbids any stealth in space while Relativity forbids FTL travel.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)